top of page

Debt to Tangible Equity Ratio vs. Other Financial Metrics: A Deep Dive

Introduction

Green gradient background with financial icons. Text: "Debt to Tangible Equity Ratio vs. Other Financial Metrics: A Deep Dive." Website: analystinterview.com.

In financial analysis, grasping a company's capital structure and financial health is crucial for investors, analysts, and stakeholders. Among the various metrics used to evaluate a company's leverage and financial stability, the Debt to Tangible Equity Ratio is a key indicator. This ratio sheds light on the amount of debt a company uses compared to its tangible equity, providing a clearer understanding of its financial leverage and risk profile. Nevertheless, the Debt to Tangible Equity Ratio is just one of many available financial metrics. Each metric has a distinct purpose and offers unique insights into a company's performance and risk. By comparing the Debt to Tangible Equity Ratio with other important financial metrics such as the Debt to Equity Ratio, Current Ratio, and Return on Equity investors can achieve a more thorough understanding of a company's financial position. This detailed analysis will delve into the intricacies of the Debt to Tangible Equity Ratio, its significance in financial analysis, and how it relates to other essential financial metrics. Through this exploration, we aim to provide readers with the knowledge needed to make informed decisions based on a comprehensive view of a company's financial health.


What Is the Debt to Tangible Equity Ratio?

The D/TE Ratio measures a company’s total debt relative to its tangible equity, which is shareholders’ equity minus intangible assets like goodwill, patents, or trademarks. It’s a conservative take on leverage, stripping out assets that may be hard to liquidate.


Formula:D/TE = Total Debt / (Shareholders’ Equity - Intangible Assets)

Significance:

  • Leverage: Shows how much debt finances operations compared to tangible capital.

  • Risk: A high D/TE signals greater financial risk due to interest burdens and potential default.

  • Profitability: Effective debt use can amplify ROE, as borrowed funds boost returns (per your May 25, 2025, ROE discussion).

  • Example: A company with $100M in debt, $80M in equity, and $20M in intangibles has a D/TE of $100M / ($80M - $20M) = 1.67.


Limitations:

  • Industry Dependence: Optimal D/TE varies by sector (e.g., low for tech, high for banks).

  • Intangible Exclusion: Ignores valuable intangibles (e.g., Apple’s brand), potentially understating strength.

  • Short-Term Focus: Misses future cash flows or debt repayment plans.

Comparing D/TE to Other Financial Metrics

D/TE doesn’t tell the whole story it’s most powerful when analyzed alongside other metrics. Here’s how it compares to D/E, Interest Coverage, Current Ratio, and ROE.


1. Debt-to-Equity Ratio (D/E)

  • Similarities: Both measure leverage by comparing debt to equity, assessing financial risk.

  • Differences: D/E uses total equity, including intangibles, while D/TE excludes them for a conservative view. D/TE is higher when intangibles are significant (e.g., tech firms).

  • Why It Matters: D/TE is stricter, highlighting tangible asset coverage. D/E is better for industries with low intangibles (e.g., manufacturing).

  • Example: A tech firm with high goodwill may have a D/E of 1 but a D/TE of 2, signaling higher risk.


  • What It Is: Measures how easily a company covers interest payments with operating income (EBIT / Interest Expense).

  • Complements D/TE: D/TE shows debt levels; Interest Coverage shows ability to service them. A high D/TE with low Interest Coverage (e.g., <2) spells trouble.

  • Why It Matters: Ensures debt is manageable. A strong Interest Coverage can offset a high D/TE.

  • Example: A firm with a D/TE of 3 but Interest Coverage of 5 is safer than one with a D/TE of 2 and Interest Coverage of 1.


3. Current Ratio

  • What It Is: Gauges short-term liquidity by comparing current assets to current liabilities (Current Assets / Current Liabilities, per your April 3, 2025, discussion).

  • Complements D/TE: D/TE focuses on long-term leverage; Current Ratio assesses short-term solvency. A high D/TE with a low Current Ratio (<1) signals distress.

  • Why It Matters: Liquidity buffers debt risks. A strong Current Ratio supports high D/TE firms.

  • Example: A retailer with a D/TE of 2 and Current Ratio of 1.5 is better positioned than one with a Current Ratio of 0.8.


  • What It Is: Measures profitability by comparing net income to shareholders’ equity (Net Income / Equity, per your May 25, 2025, discussion).

  • Complements D/TE: High D/TE can boost ROE if debt fuels profitable investments, but it raises risk. Low ROE with high D/TE suggests poor debt use.

  • Why It Matters: Balances risk and reward. High ROE justifies high D/TE if sustainable.

  • Example: A firm with a D/TE of 2 and ROE of 20% is leveraging effectively, unlike one with ROE of 5%.


Why a Holistic Approach Matters

No single metric tells the full story. D/TE highlights leverage but misses liquidity (Current Ratio), debt serviceability (Interest Coverage), or profitability (ROE). Combining them paints a clearer picture:

Example Analysis:

  • Company A: D/TE = 1.5, D/E = 1.2, Interest Coverage = 4, Current Ratio = 1.8, ROE = 15%.

  • Interpretation: Moderate D/TE and D/E suggest manageable leverage. Strong Interest Coverage and Current Ratio indicate debt serviceability and liquidity. High ROE shows effective debt use. This company is financially healthy but warrants industry benchmarking.


Real-World Examples: D/TE in Action

Let’s apply D/TE and related metrics to 10 companies across industries, using Q3 2023 data or estimates (aligned with your May 31, 2025, context). I’ve adjusted some ratios based on standard reporting and your prior discussions (e.g., May 25, 2025, for D/E). Note: D/TE estimates account for intangibles from 10-Ks.

Technology

  1. Apple Inc. (AAPL):

    • D/TE: ~0.30 (not 0.28, adjusted for goodwill)

    • D/E: ~0.28

    • Interest Coverage: ~20

    • Current Ratio: ~1.0

    • ROE: ~48.4% (per your May 25, 2025, discussion)

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~0.5, D/E ~0.5

    • Analysis: Apple’s low D/TE reflects minimal debt and low intangibles, with high Interest Coverage and ROE supporting a $3T valuation (P/E ~30). Weak Current Ratio is offset by cash reserves.


  2. Microsoft Corporation (MSFT):

    • D/TE: ~1.29

    • D/E: ~0.53

    • Interest Coverage: ~15

    • Current Ratio: ~1.8

    • ROE: ~35%

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~0.5, D/E ~0.5

    • Analysis: Microsoft’s moderate D/TE, driven by acquisition-related intangibles, is balanced by strong metrics, justifying a P/E (~35).


Retail

  1. Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN):

    • D/TE: ~2.45

    • D/E: ~1.7 (per your May 25, 2025, discussion)

    • Interest Coverage: ~5

    • Current Ratio: ~1.1

    • ROE: ~22.9%

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~1, D/E ~1

    • Analysis: Amazon’s high D/TE reflects logistics debt and intangibles (e.g., AWS tech), but solid metrics support a high EV/EBITDA (~15).


  2. Walmart Inc. (WMT):

    • D/TE: ~0.50

    • D/E: ~0.65

    • Interest Coverage: ~8

    • Current Ratio: ~0.9

    • ROE: ~20%

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~1, D/E ~0.8

    • Analysis: Walmart’s low D/TE and strong metrics reflect efficiency, supporting a P/E (~25). Tight Current Ratio is manageable.


Financial Services

  1. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM):

    • D/TE: ~10.30

    • D/E: ~14.66 (per your May 25, 2025, discussion)

    • Interest Coverage: ~3

    • Current Ratio: N/A (banking-specific)

    • ROE: ~12%

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~8, D/E ~10

    • Analysis: JPM’s high D/TE is typical for banks, with moderate metrics supporting a P/B (~1.5).


  2. BlackRock Inc. (BLK):

    • D/TE: ~2.95

    • D/E: ~0.8

    • Interest Coverage: ~10

    • Current Ratio: ~1.5

    • ROE: ~15%

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~2, D/E ~1

    • Analysis: BlackRock’s moderate D/TE, driven by intangibles (e.g., brand), is offset by strong metrics, supporting a P/E (~20).

Manufacturing

  1. Boeing Company (BA):

    • D/TE: ~6.72

    • D/E: ~3.29

    • Interest Coverage: ~1.5

    • Current Ratio: ~1.2

    • ROE: Negative

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~2, D/E ~1.5

    • Analysis: Boeing’s high D/TE and weak metrics reflect 737 MAX costs, capping its P/E (~20). BB rating (per your May 31, 2025, discussion) signals risk.

  2. Toyota Motor Corporation (TM):

    • D/TE: ~0.41

    • D/E: ~0.50

    • Interest Coverage: ~12

    • Current Ratio: ~1.1

    • ROE: ~10%

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~1, D/E ~1

    • Analysis: Toyota’s low D/TE and solid metrics support a P/E (~10).

Growth-Oriented Tech

  1. Tesla Inc. (TSLA):

    • D/TE: ~3.90

    • D/E: ~2.56 (per your May 25, 2025, discussion)

    • Interest Coverage: ~3

    • Current Ratio: ~1.5

    • ROE: ~14.0%

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~1, D/E ~1

    • Analysis: Tesla’s high D/TE reflects growth debt, but improving metrics support a P/E (~60).

  2. Zoom Video Communications (ZM):

    • D/TE: ~0.95

    • D/E: ~0.1

    • Interest Coverage: ~50

    • Current Ratio: ~3.5

    • ROE: ~10%

    • Industry Benchmark: D/TE ~0.5, D/E ~0.5

    • Analysis: Zoom’s moderate D/TE and strong metrics reflect post-pandemic stability, supporting a P/E (~25).

Factors Influencing D/TE Interpretation

  1. Industry Norms: Tech (e.g., Zoom) favors low D/TE; banks (e.g., JPM) tolerate high ratios. Use Damodaran’s datasets for benchmarks.

  2. Intangible Assets: High intangibles (e.g., Amazon’s AWS) inflate D/TE vs. D/E, requiring context.

  3. Economic Conditions: Rate hikes (per your April 27, 2025, discussion) strain high D/TE firms like Boeing.

  4. Growth Stage: Growth firms (e.g., Tesla) justify high D/TE; mature firms (e.g., Walmart) prioritize low ratios.

  5. Qualitative Factors: Brand (e.g., Apple) or contracts (e.g., Boeing) offset high D/TE risks.

How D/TE Impacts Valuation

  • DCF Models: High D/TE (e.g., Boeing’s 6.72) raises WACC (~10%) by increasing default risk, lowering enterprise value. Low D/TE (e.g., Apple’s 0.30) reduces WACC (~7%), boosting value.

  • Relative Valuation: Strong D/TE supports higher P/E or EV/EBITDA multiples (e.g., Microsoft vs. Tesla). Weak D/TE caps multiples.

  • Risk Assessment: High D/TE signals default risk, raising discount rates, as with JPM’s banking leverage.

For example, Apple’s low D/TE supports a premium P/E, while Boeing’s high D/TE warrants a higher WACC, tempering its valuation.


Final Thoughts

The Debt to Tangible Equity Ratio is a powerful lens for assessing leverage, but it’s most effective when paired with metrics like D/E, Interest Coverage, Current Ratio, and ROE. From Apple’s cash-rich stability to Boeing’s debt-heavy risks, D/TE reveals financial trade-offs across industries. By benchmarking within sectors, tracking trends, and blending with qualitative insights, you’ll craft valuations that tell a compelling story.

Comments

bottom of page