top of page

EBIT VS EBITDA a Detailed Break Down



Introduction


Understanding a company's financial health and operational performance involves delving into various profitability metrics. Two of the most essential tools analysts and investors use are EBIT and EBITDA. Here's a breakdown of what they are and why they matter:

EBIT VS EBITDA-Analyst Interview
EBIT VS EBITDA-Analyst Interview

  • What it is: EBIT reflects a company's core operating profitability by stripping out the impact of financing choices (interest) and tax jurisdictions.

  • Calculation Start with net income from the income statement and add back: Interest expense Income tax expense

  • How it's used:

  • Measure of operating performance: EBIT isolates the profitability generated from the company's core business operations.

  • Comparing companies with different debt levels: It's useful for comparing companies with different capital structures (how much debt vs. equity financing they use).

  • A proxy for Operating Income: In some cases, EBIT can be synonymous with a company's reported Operating Income.


  • What it is: EBITDA further removes the impact of non-cash expenses (depreciation and amortization) on top of the exclusions used in EBIT. This offers a higher-level view of a company's cash-generating potential.

  • Calculation Start with net income from the income statement and add back: Interest expense Income tax expense Depreciation expense Amortization expense

  • How it's used:

  • Rough estimate of cash flow: EBITDA serves as a very crude approximation of operating cash flow (though still needs significant adjustments).

  • Comparing companies with significant fixed assets: EBITDA is popular for evaluating businesses that are asset-heavy (manufacturing, telecom), since depreciation expenses can create wide variations in EBIT, obscuring operating potential.

  • Popular in valuation multiples: Used in multiples like Enterprise Value / EBITDA.


Key Differences: Depreciation and Amortization

The fundamental difference between EBIT and EBITDA lies in their treatment of non-cash expenses:

  • Depreciation: The systematic allocation of a fixed asset's cost over its useful life.

  • Amortization: Similar to depreciation, but applied to intangible assets (patents, trademarks, etc.).

By excluding depreciation and amortization, EBITDA paints a potentially rosier picture of a company's financial health than EBIT.


Which to Use: EBIT or EBITDA?

The choice between EBIT and EBITDA depends on the purpose of your analysis:

  • Operating profitability:  If you want a clearer picture of core operating performance, with the impact of asset lifecycles accounted for, EBIT is better.

  • Cash flow potential: If you're focused on a company's ability to generate cash, especially for debt repayment or acquisitions, EBITDA might be more relevant (but keep in mind it still requires adjustments to get to true cash flow figures).

  • Comparative analysis: In asset-heavy industries, EBITDA is the preferred metric for comparisons across companies, since it reduces the distortion caused by different depreciation policies.


Cautions

  • EBITDA isn't GAAP: EBITDA is a non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) measure, so it can be less reliable and consistent.

  • EBITDA can be misleading:. EBITDA hides real costs of running a business (replacing assets). When used in isolation, it may inflate a company's financial health.

Always consider both EBIT and EBITDA (alongside other metrics) for a well-rounded view of a company's financial performance.


Lets understand EBIT VS EBITDA breakdown in detail

Feature

EBIT (Earnings Before Interest & Taxes)

EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization)

Definition

Operating profit excluding interest and tax expenses

Operating profit excluding interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization expenses

Formula

Net Income + Interest Expense + Tax Expense

Net Income + Interest Expense + Tax Expense + Depreciation Expense + Amortization Expense

Focus

Core operating profitability; assesses management's efficiency in generating profit from operations

A proxy for operating cash flow; focuses on raw earning potential regardless of financing, taxes, or non-cash accounting elements

Usefulness

- Evaluates operational efficiency across companies within the same industry

- Allows comparisons across companies with differing capital structures, tax situations, and depreciation/amortization methods

Depreciation & Amortization

Excluded

Added back

Debt Impact

Excludes interest, allowing focus on profitability independent of a company's financing methods

Excludes interest, offering comparisons without regard to companies' differing debt levels

Capital-Intensive Industries

More suitable, as depreciation might significantly impact net income

Less suitable, as EBITDA obscures the high capital expenditures for asset replacement

Tax Impact

Excludes taxes, allowing focus on operational performance without distortions caused by different tax jurisdictions

Excludes taxes, simplifying comparisons regardless of different tax environments

Company Valuation

A common component in valuation multiples (e.g., EV/EBIT)

A key metric in valuation multiples (e.g., EV/EBITDA)

M&A Analysis

Useful in assessing profitability of potential target companies

Especially important in M&A deal comparisons when significant differences exist in fixed assets and capital costs

Non-Cash Expenses

Does not eliminate impact of non-cash expenses

Effectively treats depreciation and amortization as if they were non-cash expenses

Capital Intensity

Better for evaluating profitability for highly capital-intensive industries

Less suitable for capital-intensive businesses, as it doesn't consider replacement costs of expensive assets

Valuation Tool

Used as a valuation tool but should be used with caution and alongside other metrics

Often used as a quick estimate of cash flow, but has limitations for valuation purposes

Limitations

Can be distorted by unusual, non-operating items

Can mask capital expenditure needed to maintain a business

Pros

- Shows pure operating profitability - Allows cross-company comparisons within an industry

- Quick gauge of potential cash flow generation - Can highlight operating inefficiencies

Cons

- Can be misleading if unusual items present - Less relevant for capital-intensive companies

- Ignores investment expenses needed to sustain business - Prone to manipulation

Comments


Comments

Share Your ThoughtsBe the first to write a comment.
bottom of page