Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (FCCR) VS Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) A Deep Dive
- Analyst Interview
- Jun 7
- 5 min read
Introduction
In financial analysis, assessing a company's ability to fulfill its obligations is vital for investors, creditors, and management. Two essential metrics for this purpose are the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (FCCR) and the Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR). These ratios offer insights into a firm's financial health, each from a slightly different angle. The FCCR evaluates a company's ability to cover its fixed charges, such as interest and lease payments, while the DSCR measures the capacity to meet total debt obligations, including both interest and principal repayments. This detailed examination will delve into the specifics of each ratio, their calculation methods, and their implications for financial decision-making. By comparing FCCR and DSCR, we aim to emphasize their importance in assessing a firm's risk profile and operational efficiency, ultimately assisting stakeholders in making well-informed financial decisions.

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (FCCR)
The Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (FCCR) is a financial metric used to assess a company's ability to cover its fixed charges, such as interest payments, lease payments, and other fixed obligations. It provides insight into the financial health of a company and its ability to meet its long-term obligations.
Formula
The formula for calculating FCCR is:
FCCR = (EBIT + Fixed Charges) / (Fixed Charges + Interest Expenses)
Components
EBIT: Earnings Before Interest and Taxes, representing the company's profitability from operations.
Fixed Charges: Regular payments that do not change with the level of business activity, such as lease payments.
Interest Expenses: Costs incurred by the company on borrowed funds.
Interpretation
A higher FCCR indicates that a company is more capable of meeting its fixed obligations. A ratio above 1 suggests that the company generates enough earnings to cover its fixed charges, while a ratio below 1 indicates potential financial distress.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR)
The Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) measures a company's ability to service its debt, including both principal and interest payments. This ratio is crucial for lenders and investors as it indicates the financial stability and risk associated with a company.
Formula
The formula for calculating DSCR is:
DSCR = Net Operating Income / Total Debt Service
Components
Net Operating Income (NOI): The income generated from operations after deducting operating expenses, excluding taxes and interest.
Total Debt Service: The total amount of principal and interest payments due in a given period.
Interpretation
A DSCR greater than 1 indicates that a company generates sufficient income to cover its debt obligations, while a ratio less than 1 suggests that the company may struggle to meet its debt payments.
Choosing the Right Metric
So, which one should you use? It depends on what you’re trying to uncover:
FCCR is your pick for a big-picture view of a company’s ability to handle all fixed obligations. Use it when analyzing firms with diverse fixed costs, like retailers or airlines.
DSCR is better for a targeted look at debt repayment capacity. It’s critical for debt-heavy firms or when assessing loan covenant compliance.
Pro Tip: Don’t rely on one in isolation. Pair FCCR or DSCR with other metrics (e.g., debt-to-equity, interest coverage) and qualitative factors like industry trends or management strategy for a well-rounded analysis.
The Common Ground
Before we dive into the differences, let’s cover what FCCR and DSCR have in common:
Purpose: Both are coverage ratios, showing how well a company’s earnings can cover its fixed financial obligations.
Stakeholder Value: Creditors and investors lean on these metrics to assess debt repayment capacity and risk.
Numerator: Both use operating cash flow (typically EBITDA or operating income) as the starting point.
But here’s where they diverge, and knowing these distinctions can make your analysis stand out.
FCCR vs. DSCR: The Key Differences
1. Scope of Obligations
FCCR: Takes a broader view, capturing all fixed charges, including:
Interest expenses on debt
Preferred stock dividends
Lease payments (operating and finance leases)
Sinking fund payments This makes FCCR a catch-all for fixed financial commitments, not just debt-related ones.
DSCR: Zooms in on debt-specific obligations, typically:
Interest expenses on debt
Principal repayments It’s laser-focused on whether a company can service its loans without defaulting.
2. Interpretation
FCCR: Gives a holistic picture of a company’s ability to cover all fixed costs. A higher FCCR (e.g., >1.5) signals strong financial health across the board, while a low FCCR (e.g., <1.2) raises red flags about covering ongoing commitments.
DSCR: Focuses narrowly on debt repayment capacity. A DSCR above 1.5 suggests low default risk, while a DSCR below 1.0 screams trouble—especially for lenders.
3. Industry Relevance
FCCR: Shines in industries with hefty fixed costs beyond debt, like airlines (think Delta’s plane leases), hospitality (Marriott’s hotel leases), or utilities. It’s your go-to for capital-intensive sectors where leases and other fixed charges are significant.
DSCR: Rules in industries where debt is the main story, like real estate or finance. If you’re analyzing a REIT or a leveraged buyout, DSCR is your metric of choice.
Real-World Examples
Let’s see how these ratios play out with companies you might be covering:
Marriott International (Hotels):
FCCR: 1.25 (includes hotel lease payments)
DSCR: 1.75 (debt-focused)
Takeaway: Marriott’s FCCR shows it can cover all fixed charges, but its higher DSCR suggests stronger debt repayment capacity. Analysts should monitor lease obligations alongside debt metrics.
Delta Air Lines (Airlines):
FCCR: 1.10 (high plane lease costs)
DSCR: 1.50 (significant debt)
Takeaway: Delta’s tight FCCR reflects pressure from leases, but its DSCR is decent. Watch jet fuel prices and passenger demand, as they heavily impact Delta’s cash flow.
Apple Inc. (Technology):
FCCR: Not applicable (minimal fixed charges)
DSCR: 12.00 (low debt, high earnings)
Takeaway: Apple’s low fixed costs make FCCR less relevant, but its sky-high DSCR screams financial strength. Focus on its cash reserves and buyback programs instead.
Ford Motor Company (Automobile):
FCCR: 1.30 (leases, pension obligations)
DSCR: 1.05 (high debt, restructuring costs)
Takeaway: Ford’s FCCR is okay, but its razor-thin DSCR signals debt repayment risks. Dig into its restructuring plans and auto sales forecasts.
Netflix Inc. (Streaming Services):
FCCR: Not applicable (minimal fixed charges)
DSCR: Negative (high debt, negative cash flow)
Takeaway: Netflix’s negative DSCR is a red flag for debt sustainability. Analysts should track subscriber growth and cash burn closely.
Key Takeaways for Analysts
Context is King: FCCR is broader and better for capital-intensive firms; DSCR is debt-focused and critical for loan-heavy industries. Know your sector.
Benchmark Smartly: Compare FCCR and DSCR to industry peers. A DSCR of 1.5 might be great for real estate but weak for tech.
Stress-Test Your Models: Run scenarios for rising interest rates or revenue drops to see how FCCR and DSCR hold up. This shows clients you’re thinking ahead.
Watch for Adjustments: Companies and lenders may use custom versions of these ratios. Check 10-Ks or loan agreements for specifics.
Combine with Other Metrics: Pair FCCR/DSCR with leverage ratios, cash flow trends, and macro factors like interest rates to paint a full picture.
Final Thoughts
FCCR and DSCR are like two sides of a coin both tell you about a company’s ability to manage obligations, but they focus on different angles. As analysts, these ratios help you cut through the noise of financial statements to assess risk and resilience. Whether you’re digging into a hotel chain’s lease burden or a tech giant’s debt capacity, knowing when to use FCCR or DSCR can elevate your analysis from good to great. So, next time you’re building a model or writing a report, lean on these metrics to uncover the real story behind a company’s financial health.
Comments